<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English Tea History – Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Bigelow Tea</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phamt</title>
		<link>http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/#comment-16027</link>
		<dc:creator>Phamt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/#comment-16027</guid>
		<description>I have been paying attention mostly to how tea got to england, but it seems I missed some drama behind the tea history in England. This is very interesting. 

Thanks
Phamt
www.nature-healthy-tea.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been paying attention mostly to how tea got to england, but it seems I missed some drama behind the tea history in England. This is very interesting. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Phamt<br />
<a href="http://www.nature-healthy-tea.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature-healthy-tea.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/#comment-15464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigelowteablog.com/2007/11/16/english-tea-history-%e2%80%93-part-i/#comment-15464</guid>
		<description>Actually I watching Monarchy with David Starkey I think way Charles 2 treated Cathierne of Branazera was very wrong that dude has least 16 mistress who bore him between 4 to 10 children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I watching Monarchy with David Starkey I think way Charles 2 treated Cathierne of Branazera was very wrong that dude has least 16 mistress who bore him between 4 to 10 children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
